if there was any question to the notion that corporate entities should pay very close attention to the blogsphere, this should settle it. Go check out the Yahoo message board for Pepsi (NYSE:PEP) following the ugly commencement speech that CFO Indra Nooyi gave to Columbia's MBA graduating class recently. This story erupted in blogs over the last week, not a word spilled about it in the MSM (nor would there be considering what Nooyi was saying in her speech.) The firestorm caused Nooyi to put a statement on Pepsico's website first suggesting that her comments were misconstrued, but today there is a statement on the homepage expressing that she is "deeply sorry".
Link: Yahoo! PEP.
(a) Fee- The Register of Copyrights shall charge a fee of $1 for maintaining in force the copyright in any published United States work. The fee shall be due 50 years after the date of first publication or on December 31, 2006, whichever occurs later, and every 10 years thereafter until the end of the copyright term. Unless payment of the applicable maintenance fee is received in the Copyright Office on or before the date the fee is due or within a grace period of 6 months thereafter, the copyright shall expire as of the end of that grace period.
Skype Journal reports on the progress of SkypeSee, which is the video conferencing feature that is on Skype's product roadmap (as mentioned here in Toronto during VON Canada last month). Basically, the latest 17w version beta (IMHO, the product is already in beta, not alpha quality) is pretty light (only 359k) with good video refresh rates and crisp resolution (users can read 11pt. text from the other site - that is impressive). The GUI still needs some refinements, but the hacker in me finds it OK. Funny enough, thus far, they are calling this product wigiwigi, and it already has its own forum.
BP, following on the heels of Morgan Stanley, has adopted a policy of pulling advertising from publications that give the company bad press, and requiring publications to give BP prepub look-sees if it is mentioned in cover stories, AdWeek reports.
This strikes me as unbelievably stupid and abusive, since magazines are in a very weak position to reject major ad buys from these guys. It's funny that there is so much talk about journalistic ethics, and about how Newsweek must hate America, when corporations are free to abuse the power of the buck.
AdWeek quotes an unnamed publishing exec: "I think it's OK to have systems in place to pull advertisers out, but clearly we don't show them stories ahead of time. ... It's a stupid request. It makes you think these guys are hiding something."
Comments on this Entry:
My home town launches a free Wi-Fi pilot in today's who's hot round-up.
Seattle, Wash.: The city turned on free Wi-Fi access in the business districts of Columbia City and the University District, both areas that could use a bit of a boost. In the next month, four city parks will get free Wi-Fi, too: Occidental, Freeway, Westlake, and Victor Steinbrueck.

"A 60ft high picture of a murdered prostitute has been projected onto a derelict block of flats in Glasgow."
In today’s comments at the VON ‘05 conference in Stockholm, Niklas Zennstrom gave some interesting clues as to his ambitions for Skype. I’ve long suspected Skype of wanting to essentially take over and replace the public telephone network, but now it’s coming from the horse’s mouth (from the Inquirer):
Zennstrom revealed that he was particularly keen on an embedded Linux version of his product. The goal appears to bring out devices which contain a dedicated Sykpe client. He almost certainly appears to be thinking of Wi-Fi handsets.
Embedded Skype means third-party devices can gain interoperability with (and possibly dependence upon) the
Skype peer-to-peer network. Like the Skype API, only not restricted to Windows PCs. Imagine that. Licensed embedded
endpoints accessing a proprietary network. Kind of sounds like the Microsoft of the early 1990s, doesn’t it?
But that’s not even the most revealing tidbit. Niklas also said that an open standard should be developed to solve the
E911 call-routing problem, since, at least at this point, it doesn’t look like Skype is going to be able to avoid
regulation (they’re a PSTN-connected carrier, after all). Skype, of course, does not use an open
standard such as SIP or Dundi for its own call-signaling, so it’s somewhat ironic that Mr. Zennstrom is calling upon
the community to solve his E911 dilemma with open standards.
For the record, I agree with Zennstrom on that point—an open standard for emergency dispatch calling should be
created. But not merely for Skype’s sake. Of course, if Skype were to embrace an open 911 standard, but not play
nice with all the other truly open interop standards out there, it would be a shame. Since Skype clearly
has its focus set on rebuilding the international telecom system as we know it, I sure hope Skype doesn’t become
the “Windows of telephony”.
| |
|
|
The mayor of Boxtel, the municipality where the Dutch outdoor hacker conferences What The Hack resides, seems to be refusing a permit for the conference, citing "grave fear that the organisation of this event will endanger law and order as well as public safety".

Previous instances of this event have seen no incidents of any kind. We feel this matter needs public attention to get resolved, and we issued a press statement today.
Via The Lunatic Fringe. Press Release.
If there's more than one site you always visit after starting up Firefox, you can set your homepage to open several tabs of different web sites at once automatically.
From Firefox's Tools menu, Options, General, enter the addresses of sites separated by a pipe |, as shown above. Or, you can open up all the sites in tabs and hit the "Use Current Pages" button. Thanks, Robert!
From Morgan Stanley analyst Scott Patick's note to clients:
Fidelity Cuts Rates for Online Options Trades
Quick Comment: Fidelity Investments announced today reduced base commissions and per contract fees for options trades. Effective immediately, Fidelity has lowered the per contract fee for all online options trades to $0.75 from $1.50-2.25 previously, depending upon customer tier. In addition, the company has aligned its base commission rates for online options trades with its rates for equity trades. As such, the base commission for an option trade executed by a Bronze customer (i.e., no minimum trading or asset requirements) declined to $19.95 from $25, while that for the mid-tier Silver customer (i.e., $50,000+ in assets, $25,000+ in assets and 36+ trades in a rolling 12-month period, or 72+ trades in a 12-month period) fell to $10.95 from $20. Meanwhile, for active traders and those with $1 million or more in assets, the base commission for option trades remained unchanged at $8. Though the cuts in base commission for online option trades were quite significant in some instances, the decision to bring base rates in line with the company's equity base rates is consistent with the industry standard. Meanwhile, the new flat per contract fee of $0.75 is in line with Ameritrade's fee, but now undercuts per contract fees at Schwab and those for all but the most active customers at E*Trade.
Options remain a key area of competition among online brokers. Fidelity's substantial cuts in option trading rates highlight the drive among online brokers to gain share in lucrative options trades. To put the opportunity in perspective, an average retail options trade of 15 contracts or so executed by an active trader at Fidelity would generate commission revenue of $19.25, nearly 2.5 times the $8 commission the company would collect for an equity trade. Meanwhile, we do not believe that the expense differential for an options trade versus a cash equity trade is substantial for online brokers. While we believe that Fidelity's cuts could drive some pricing tweaks among the competition in the coming months, the company's pricing changes, in our view, were much more about bringing pricing in line with the industry than about setting new price points (which mitigates any risk of significant moves from other brokers in response to Fidelity's announcement).
With a meaningful convergence in industry pricing at rather low levels, we continue to expect pricing to stabilize (though we do still expect long-term pricing erosion in the industry). Though we think that aligning pricing schedules within the general range of broader industry pricing is a competitive imperative, we nonetheless think that the focal points of competition are increasingly shifting toward factors such as functionality, speed, execution quality, value-added tools, and customer service, rather than price. Indeed, we simply do not believe that demand is generally elastic enough at this point to move substantial numbers of customers for $1 or $2 per trade. Importantly, in the environment of eroding pricing (rather than falling pricing) that we see, we believe that online brokerage companies can continue to improve profitability through technological efficiencies and scale.
Overweight-V rated International Securities Exchange ($25.44) should be a key beneficiary of any acceleration in retail options trading related to recent pricing cuts. While the push among retail brokers to drive higher options trading volumes among their customers should benefit options exchanges more generally, we believe that ISE's all-electronic platform and deeper liquidity pools makes ISE a natural destination for this liquidity.
A few days have passed since I used and published my initial impressions of Yahoo Unlimited, and during that time, I have come a conclusion, though that word has such finality to it. Yahoo Unlimited is an ad-supported personal radio network.
There, I said it. Now let me explain. Radio networks normally have preset play lists, and deejays that manage those play lists. The songs, which are broadcast in a one-size fit all model, are interspersed with advertisements. Ads bring in the dollars, and keep large terrestrial radio network owners in gravy.
In case of Yahoo Unlimited, the online company offers up a million songs, turns you into a deejay and charges you $5 a month. (As long as you don’t download the tunes to devices!) If people transfer music subscriptions to a device, they cost Yahoo about $6 a month, and as a result the whole model is unprofitable to begin with. (Business Week reported that Yahoo could be paying around $8 a month to the music industry, but my sources are saying its $6 per subscriber per month.)
Given the state of the MP3 player device market, and the minimal support for devices as of now, in reality Yahoo’s music service is all about making customers sign-up and listed to music on their PCs. It makes most economic sense of the company.
Of that $5-a-month subscription fees, Yahoo is going to send about $3.50 goes to the music industry, a number of industry sources have told me. (Business week put this figure at $6 a month.) As long as folks don’t start moving songs over to their devices! Lets assume it costs Yahoo spends about $1 per user on infrastructure, hosting and bandwidth costs. Its total costs are about $4.50 or so.
In other words, the money to be made for Yahoo here is about $0.50 per user per month or about $6 a year. Even with a million subscribers, that works out to about $6 million a year. That’s not enough to even cause a blip on Yahoo’s bottom-line.
Enter advertising. If Yahoo can sell ads worth $2 a month on its PC-only service, the monthly profits can swiftly climb. More ad-dollars will mean even more cash in the bank for Yahoo! In other words, you play the deejay; create your play lists and ad dollars make it all happen. Just like a radio network, except one with extreme personalization.
Hypothetical scenario: what if Yahoo turned this into a free service, and decided to eat all the costs, that is $4.50 a month – within days it would have more than 20 million users who will sign-up. $6.50 a month of advertising minus the costs of $4.50 every month, on every user means $130 million a month or $1.56 billion a year. Even with costs hovering around $1.08 billion, Yahoo could make some serious cash here. Has the record industry hoisted by its own petard?
The problem is that this model won’t work for Napster or Real Networks – they just don’t have the scale of Yahoo, or the audiences to cherry pick from 176 million registered users. Yahoo will become their single biggest nightmare. And while that is happening, Apple will continue to sell its iTunes! Think of it this way – if Yahoo Unlimited is Infinity Broadcasting, then Apple is Virgin.
There are a couple of issues, I admit.
1. It’s going be tough to sell advertising in an area that right now at least is subscription only and actually convincing consumers would be most difficult aspect of my theory.
2. Given the level of greed at the record labels, they are most likely to demand a cut of any money Yahoo makes on advertising.
But despite that Yahoo has got to be thinking that advertising is their endgame, for sure, or Steve wins his bet. Though I would say, Jerry has better odds. On Yahoo Music every time you look at a bio or something else you end up on a page with a (surprise!) banner ad.
Morgan Stanley's Stephen Roach believes the world should prepare for the increasing possibility of a meaningful slowdown of the Chinese economy. Here are the key points from Roach's May 23rd piece entitled "What if China Slows?":
Economic Growth
Demand Side Shows Discomforting Signs
Chinese Import Growth Fuels Pan-Asian Exports
China's Import Slowdown Affecting Commodity Inflation
Efforts to Curb the Property Bubble
Chinese GDP Growth Risks
Roach Believes China's Policymakers will be Cautious
Key Deficiencies of China’s Growth Model
Conclusion
Why Now
According to Roach:
....This time, it will be much tougher for China to avoid a meaningful slowdown. It’s time for the rest of the world to prepare for just such a possibility.
Comment: Full article here.
The just-released MSN Search Toolbar adds desktop search to Windows, email search to Outlook and web search to Internet Explorer.
The MSN Search Toolbar adds a search box to four places: your Windows task bar, your Outlook toolbar (not including Outlook Express), Internet Explorer and Windows File Explorer. The initial index takes awhile to build on large hard drives with lots of files, but the search is fast and the results complete, for a much better alternative to Windows' built-in search. The bummer, of course, is the Outlook/IE-exclusive support for web and email search. (Note: both the free Copernic and Google Desktop search support Thunderbird and Eudora email.) So, final verdict? The MSN Search Toolbar is perfect for IE and Outlook users, and ok for others looking for a quick built-in desktop search. Free download, Windows only.
Just-unveiled ChicagoCrime.org is a free database of criminal activity reported in Chicago which uses Google Maps to display where bad things happen.
For example, here's a map of reported armed robberies with a handgun, here are wrongdoings reported between 2 and 3 AM on May 5th, and this is a list of misdeeds that occurred in a bowling alley. It's the Chicago police blotter on crack! (Pun intended). Chicagoans, RSS feeds for your neighborhood crimes available so your newsreader can scare you out of your wits. The data ranges from Februrary of this year until May 5th, and presumably will be updated. Thanks, Jason!
LightReading’s unnamed sources say that The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is going to make basic e911 mandatory requirement for all VoIP providers, and the decision could come as soon as May 19th. e911 is a politically charged issue, and many in FCC and Congress are worried about a consumer backlash, which might affect future election results. The VoIP service providers will have till early November to comply. In other words, nothing much they can do about it. “This could quickly put a monkey wrench into some of these startups’ plans,” Jon Arnold of Arnold & Associates told LR. This is going to force VoIP providers to spend some serious dollars, and could possibly be the first step in the much awaited shakeout in the market. The bells, in many ways could one again emerge winners. I think this does prove out the age old telecom theory: those with infrastructure are going to win. Or something to that effect.
Clay Shirky comes out with a very comprehensive paper on web content ontology and he goes to the extent of analyzing the likes of Periodic table classification, yahoo information architecture, del.icio.us mechanisms to come to the conclusion that ontology is overrated. Extracts with edits and comments from a near 25 page heavy stuff article.
On Tagging :Many of the ways we're attempting to apply categorization to the digital world are actually a bad fit, because we've adopted habits of mind that are left over from earlier strategies. What we're seeing when we see the Web is actually a radical break with previous categorization strategies, rather than an extension of them. Our current categorization schemes allow, based on two units - the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The strategy of tagging – free form labeling, without regard to categorical constraints - seems like a recipe for disaster, but as the Web has shown , one can extract a surprising amount of value from big messy data sets.
On Browse Vs Search :Browse versus search is a radical increase in the trust we put in link infrastructure, and in the degree of power derived from that link structure. Browse says the people making the ontology, the people doing the categorization, have the responsibility to organize the world in advance. Given this requirement, the views of the catalogers necessarily override the user's needs and the user's view of the world. If you want something that hasn't been categorized in the way you think about it, you're out of luck. The search paradigm says the reverse. It says nobody gets to tell you in advance what it is you need. Search says that, at the moment that you are looking for it, we will do our best to service it based on this link structure, because we believe we can build a world where we don't need the hierarchy to coexist with the link structure.
On Categorisation :A lot of the conversation that's going on now about categorization starts at a second step - "Since categorization is a good way to organize the world, we should..." But the first step is to ask the critical question: Is categorization a good idea? We can see, from the Yahoo versus Google example, that there are a number of cases where you get significant value out of not categorizing. Even Google adopted DMOZ, the open source version of the Yahoo directory, and later they downgraded its presence on the site, because almost no one was using it. When people were offered search and categorization side-by-side, fewer and fewer people were using categorization to find things.
On Tags: As you can see here, the characteristics of a del.icio.us entry are a link, an optional extended description, and a set of tags, which are words or phrases users attach to a link. Each user who adds a link to the system can give it a set of tags - some do, some don't. Attached to each link on the home page are the tags, the username of the person who added it, the number of other people who have added that same link, and the time. Tags are simply labels for URLs, selected to help the user in later retrieval of those URLs. Tags have the additional effect of grouping related URLs together. There is no fixed set of categories or officially approved choices. You can use words, acronyms, numbers, whatever makes sense to you, without regard for anyone else's needs, interests, or requirements.
On Tags & Conclusion:The addition of a few simple labels hardly seems so momentous, but the surprise here, as so often with the Web, is the surprise of simplicity. Tags are important mainly for what they leave out. By forgoing formal classification, tags enable a huge amount of user-produced organizational value, at vanishingly small cost. The tag overlap is in the system, but the tag semantics are in the users. This is not a way to inject linguistic meaning into the machine. It's all dependent on human context. This is what we're starting to see with del.icio.us, with Flickr, with systems that are allowing for and aggregating tags. The signal benefit of these systems is that they don't recreate the structured, hierarchical categorization so often forced onto us by our physical systems. Instead, we're dealing with a significant break - by letting users tag URLs and then aggregating those tags, we're going to be able to build alternate organizational systems, systems that, like the Web itself, do a better job of letting individuals create value for one another, often without realizing it.
So there's this pattern of maturity in a technology -- from proprietary to "open" -- as players in the industry resolve they can't bet their future on trusting one particular player. And so it is happening in the digital camera industry, as users and developers demand an OpenRAW standard.

The free sound editor software Audacity lets you record and edit digital audio, convert tapes and records into MP3's or CDs, cut, copy, splice, and mix sounds together or change the speed or pitch of a recording.
If you've got some old mix tapes laying around you'd like to digitize, or you're up for jumping on the podcasting wagon, Audacity's the way to go. Free as in speech, Windows/Mac/Linux.
Some sleuthing shows that it does…
One of the most amazing aspects of Skype has been this unshakeable belief that the company does not have any network infrastructure, barring a few directory servers and other more web-related boxes. In the early days Vonage offered same arguments – we don’t have network infrastructure – thus we are more efficient. More subscribers signed on, network outages began, and well there is infrastructure. And increasingly it costs money.
How can Skype be any different? After all despite its P2P nature, there needs to be some management. The edge can be smart, but hyper-smart? And given that it’s growing like weeds after a monsoon shower, I wondered how could Skype sustain the quality that endears Skype to its users.
I admit, after contemplating about this road, I put this on the back burner. I have been lately distracted by other stuff I am keen on these days, and have largely ignored the nuanced stuff lately. I am trying to rectify that. Fortunately for all of us, there are three men who did not believe - Aswath Rao, DG Lewis, and James Enck.
Lewis thinks that now that Skype had SkypeIn and SkypeOut, it needs to connect with PSTN, and that means hardware that would interface with partners like Colt, iBasis, and Cable & Wireless. He argued that since Skype uses a proprietary technology, it would at some point need to convert signals to more commonly used protocols.
Somewhere, SkypeOut traffic has to be converted from G.729a packets to G.711 A-law or mu-law TDM (and the reverse for SkypeIn). And somewhere, call control signaling has to be converted to some standard PSTN signaling for network interconnection.
My theory is that they treat the media gateways as Skype clients and so they “register” with a supernode, which are Skype’s own computers. These supernodes map Skype protocol to SIP. Here SIP is only a “trunking” protocol. So the mapping is not complex.
James, did more work, and chatted with his sources within the company and came up with this argument:
“It is my understanding from recent conversations with the company itself that Skype has built and deployed its own-spec gateways, and that supernode designation is far from a random selection process. Also, the now-famous “authentication server in Denmark” is not the only one of its kind.”
In final conclusion, there are signs that Skype has infrastructure, though details on it are hazy. Aswath puts it best when he writes,
For a long time Vonage and its apologists were claiming that they do not have any network infrastructure and are still able to offer voice service. It has stopped as the network failures became well known. Slowly it is becoming Skype’s turn.
We recently covered Phil Windley's collection of search engines which Phil says he uses on a regular basis when looking for different types of information.In a study of Internet searches, only 3% of results were shared by Ask Jeeves, Google, and Yahoo, demonstrating the differences between the major engines.Dogpile research shows that the search results delivered by Ask Jeeves, Google, and Yahoo differ substantially from one another. Using a random sampling taken from query logs, the study found that just over 3% of the returned results were shared by Ask Jeeves, Google, and Yahoo. Some 12% of the returned results were listed by two of the three search engines. And 85% of the results were unique to one of the three search engines.
Major search engines are not interchangeable and that metasearch engines offer a broader range of top-ranked results.As a metasearch engine, Dogpile aggregates search results from Ask Jeeves, Google, and Yahoo.Beyond simply gathering search results from several sources in one place, Dogpile tries to make the results more relevant by combining sponsored and algorithmic results in a single ranked list. The text label "Sponsored by" distinguishes one kind of result from another. This is a significant departure from Ask Jeeves, Google, and Yahoo, all of which separate paid links from unpaid ones more clearly using color, graphics, and position on the page. Dogpile also adjusts the order in which search results appear using its own search technology. While Dogpile's self-sponsored survey-in which a metasearch engine finds there's value in metasearch engines-makes a strong case for using the site, consumer usage patterns have a logic all their own
Guy Brightonpoints to Ntro' amazing insight about the evolution of Web TV. By combining RSS with BitTorrent we'll have sort of mini-Tivos on our PC - able to select the content we want at a micro level. With Bittorrent and RSS, one can easily create an internet-based periodical broadcast of huge files with almost zero distribution cost. With MythTV and Torrentocracy, one can create a set-top box such as a Tivo or VCR that consumes such a broadcast. It’s possible to replace (or complement)a satellite receiver and DVD player with a cheap PC running MythTV, and still stay up to date on Desperate Housewives.
Most popular TV programs are available via BitTorrent within hours (sometimes minutes) of their debut. That’s not revolutionary– Tivo has provided that ability (sans BitTorrent) for years. What makes this device truly revolutionary is this: Not only will this be able to download scheduled network programs, it will be able to download multimedia content from any feed to which you decide to subscribe. BitTorrent, unlike most file transfer mechanisms, performs best when there is high demand for a resource, because the load is distributed across all clients, including the ones that have not completed the download. Through RSS, a feed provider can announce a new resource to all subscribers as soon as it available, thereby immediately creating high demand for the file, and fast downloads for all. BitTorrent’s biggest weakness is the inability to view partial content, thus making it suboptimal for on-demand videos, since you can’t start watching the video until you’ve finished downloading it. That’s what makes RSS and BitTorrent such a happy couple– if configured properly, files can be downloaded as they are announced (say, in the middle of the night or while you are at work), and will be complete by the time you are ready to watch them, eliminating the need to stream content.
Online, of course. From Mediapost's coverage of a Burst study:
Asked about their media consumption habits over the past year, 61 percent of the respondents said they spend more time on the Internet today than a year ago, with 32 percent saying they spend "much more time," and 29 percent claiming to spend "somewhat more time" online.
Also, Fathom reports keyword prices are up 11% in April.
Read the full Mother Jones article on municipal broadband (enter code MJZL6Y to read full article): The fine folks at Mother Jones sent me an access code and permission to post it so you can read the full article they published in this month's issue about the Tri-Cities, Illinois, battle with SBC and Comcast on one side and the city's business-backed goals of providing municipal broadband on the other.
Interestingly, the Tri-Cities now have substantially greater broadband services: the two incumbents spent hundreds of thousands to defeat two ballot initiatives, and then probably tens of millions to upgrade their networks.
For starters, guys I would like to say, that I am not making this up. A San Diego-start-up, Nethercomm Corp., which has no trial partners or no known venture capital backers, is promising that it can deliver up to 10 gigabits per second broadband using natural gas pipelines.
The idea here is to encode the broadband signals using ultra wideband and beam them through the pipeline, and then at the gas meter, the signal is offloaded (using Nethercomm equipment off course) to on-the-premise wireline or wireless networks. The company, which lists Patrick and Ann Munally as co-founders, thinks this is a neat work around the current restrictions on the UWB for now. Since the wireless transmitters are in the pipeline, it is a closed environment. The company explains that its technology needs no modifications to the existing natural gas distribution infrastructures.
Still, I find the whole concept a little baffling. The biggest concern is UWB itself. I understand this as a short-range technology, which can deliver great speeds. Here is what wikipedia has to say about UWB.
Ultra-wideband or UWB is a developing communication technology that delivers very high-speed network data exchange rates across relatively short distances with a low power source. Although the connection speed decreases quickly as a function of distance, UWB has the potential to replace the cables that currently connect devices.
If that is the case, then it means that a substantial number of UWB modules would need to embedded in a pipeline, and that could make the project a tad expensive. In other words, it would need some serious dollar commitment from gas companies. For instance installing the hardware inside the pipes would entail shutting off gas supplies. That alone could be a cost prohibitive affair. In addition, the energy companies are still recovering from their ill-conceived affair with fiber and broadband networks, led by the king-con of them all, Enron. Ann Nunally, President and COO of the San Diego-based Nethercomm Corporation in a press statement was quick to say, that they “have been extremely tight-lipped about this innovation until our Patent Portfolio foundation was completely in place.”
Having said that, energy and gas companies use wireless sensors for meter readings and monitoring the health of the pipelines.
More from Techdirt and Corante
MIT Technology Review Online on March 21 retracted two stories written in whole or in part by Michelle Delio, citing the publication's inability to confirm a source. On April 4, InfoWorld edited four articles by Delio to remove anonymous quotes. Wired News has published more than 700 news stories written by Delio (under the names Michelle Delio and Michelle Finley) since 2000. In April, we assigned journalism professor and Wired News columnist Adam Penenberg to review recent articles written by Delio for Wired News.ws Releases Source Review" (Disclosure: I am a contributor to Wired News).Penenberg and his staff of graduate students at New York University reviewed 160 articles, largely from 2004, but some earlier stories were also checked. Penenberg provided Wired News with a list of 24 stories that contained sources he could not confirm (links are included at the end of this story). Penenberg's report to Wired News can be downloaded here (PDF). Delio, in communications with Penenberg and Wired News, stands by her reporting and the existence and accuracy of her sources. Most of Delio's sources were in fact located and confirmed by Penenberg.
The unconfirmed sources affect the content of these stories to varying degrees. For example, the Florida network tax story contains only one quote from a source Penenberg could not confirm, but the quote does not materially affect the rest of the story. However, there are four articles in which unconfirmed sources arguably play a more prominent role.